NASDAQ 100
$QQQAs of 29 September 2026, 13 tracked analysts hold a current view on NASDAQ 100: 11 Analysts Bullish · 0 Analysts Neutral · 2 Analysts Bearish. Every view links to the analyst's own post or video moment.
Catch-Up
Generated 08:00 ET
The picture is unchanged: $QQQ has pushed to fresh highs and the technical backdrop remains constructive, with relative strength and a higher low supporting further upside. The qualification is narrowing participation beneath a quiet advance, while elevated rates, oil and the dollar remain potential stress points. The main bearish challenge is an oil-driven market shock, though a positive Strait of Hormuz development could instead accelerate the rally.
A daily catch-up of talking heads, in fifteen minutes.
Sentiment Graph
Analyst Views on NASDAQ 100
The Nasdaq 100 downtrend has snapped, with prices trading above the channel despite elevated rates, oil, and the dollar, signaling near-term resilience.
Nasdaq could rise 10% quickly if positive Strait of Hormuz developments emerge, as investors remain eager to chase the next rally leg.
Nasdaq 100 relative strength versus the S&P 500 has broken out and remains above a rising 200-day moving average, unlike early 2022.
The Nasdaq should continue toward a new all-time high as long as its most recent swing-trade higher low remains intact.
$QQQ has reached a new all-time high even as broad sector participation has deteriorated sharply over the past month.
Nasdaq 100 reached a new all-time high this week in an unusually quiet advance, reflecting continued upward price momentum.
Nasdaq 100 strength is continuing, with the index drifting higher and finishing near session highs while the S&P remained flat.
Nasdaq and AI-linked equities remain constructive, supported by a new NQ high and a chart that remains difficult to dispute.
Nasdaq appears positioned for upside as heavy technology volatility looks cheap relative to July extremes, following an 8% decline during the volatility spread re-sync.
$QQQ could stage a near-term relief rally after several rough, oversold sessions if the FOMC message is interpreted positively.
The NASDAQ 100 remains bullish and oversold in the volatility-adjusted momentum and probable-range models, retaining a positive near-term price signal.
Nasdaq 100 faces downside risk from another oil price surge, with a put spread held against the broader market shock scenario.
Nasdaq remains a bearish near-term trade, maintaining a tactical downside view for $QQQ rather than signaling a durable market reversal.
Wordcloud
Direction By Day
| 15 SEP | 16 SEP | 17 SEP | 18 SEP | 19 SEP | 20 SEP | 21 SEP | 22 SEP | 23 SEP | 24 SEP | 25 SEP | 26 SEP | 27 SEP | 28 SEP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brent Kochuba | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | · | · |
| Brian Shannon | ■ | ■ | · | · | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ |
| Chris Ciovacco | · | · | · | · | · | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ |
| David Keller | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | · |
| David Woo | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | ▼ | ▼ |
| JC Parets | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ |
| Jason Shapiro | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | · |
| Joseph Wang | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | ▲ | ▲ |
| Keith Mccullough | ▼ | ▼ | ▼ | ▼ | ▼ | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · |
| Lance Roberts | · | · | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | · | · | · | · | · | · | · |
| Mark Newton | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ |
| Peter Reznicek | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | ▲ | ▲ |
Sentiment Heatmap
| 15 SEP | 16 SEP | 17 SEP | 18 SEP | 19 SEP | 20 SEP | 21 SEP | 22 SEP | 23 SEP | 24 SEP | 25 SEP | 26 SEP | 27 SEP | 28 SEP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brent Kochuba | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | · | · |
| Brian Shannon | ■ | ■ | · | · | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ |
| Chris Ciovacco | · | · | · | · | · | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ |
| David Keller | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | · |
| David Woo | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | ▼ | ▼ |
| JC Parets | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ |
| Jason Shapiro | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | · |
| Joseph Wang | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | ▲ | ▲ |
| Keith Mccullough | ▼ | ▼ | ▼ | ▼ | ▼ | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · |
| Lance Roberts | · | · | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | · | · | · | · | · | · | · |
| Mark Newton | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ | ▲ |
| Peter Reznicek | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | ▲ | ▲ |